[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Sep 2015 11:30:00 +0100 |
Federico Bruni wrote Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:27 AM
>
> Il giorno mer 2 set 2015 alle 11:11, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden> ha
> scritto:
>
>>> meanwhile we use Bitbucket or Github? Not Free services, I know, but at
>>> least their business model seems honest.
>>
>> This is on the GC FAQ covering migration to GitHub:
>>
>>> Error "Project cannot be migrated because it has too many issues." There is
>>> a hard limit on the number of issues that can be exported by the tool, per
>>> repo. If your project has more than 1,000 issues the export will fail.
>>
>> We have over 4,000. With image attachments.
>
> That was the one-button migration.
> I followed this guide:
> https://code.google.com/p/support-tools/wiki/IssueExporterTool
>
> And migrated the issues in 10 minutes.
That is impressive; looks like I was misled.
> I made the bitbucket repository public:
> https://bitbucket.org/fedelibre/lilyissues/issues?status=new&status=open
I don't see how to set up searches; is that possible?
And we'd be limited to 5 developers, unless we pay, it seems.
Hardly opensource.
Trevor
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, (continued)
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Trevor Daniels, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, David Kastrup, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, David Kastrup, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Trevor Daniels, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, David Kastrup, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, David Kastrup, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Trevor Daniels, 2015/09/02
Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2015/09/04