Re: Web: Review GSoC page (issue 285400043 by address@hidden)

[paulwmorris]

LGTM, with one minor suggestion.
Thanks Urs, I think this really improves this page.
-Paul


https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode1107
Documentation/web/community.itexi:1107: achievements with regard to
LilyPond's default output quality.
On 2016/02/07 23:07:27, git wrote:
> On 2016/02/06 20:53:30, pwm wrote:
> > I don't think this is needed.  It breaks out of the pattern of just
describing
> > the project and gets into editorializing about its comparative worth
relative
> to
> > other projects, or even how rewarding it would be.  Maybe someone
would find
> > another project more rewarding?  Seems like this is better suited
for a
> > conversation with a student.

> Hm, my intention was to draw the attention to the fact that this
project relates
> to actual engraving quality. But I've taken your suggestion.

Hmm... that's a good idea.  Maybe add this to the title?  "Improve
engraving quality of slurs and ties" or (if not the title) maybe in the
first sentence: "The engraving quality of the default curves of slurs
and ties is often unsatisfactory."

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/