Re: make metronomeMarkFormatter more flexible (issue 327620043 by address@hidden)

[thomasmorley65]

On 2017/10/15 13:09:30, kieren_macmillan_sympatico.ca wrote:
> Hi David,

> > I think it's rather obvious that we won't get something that caters
for
> > every format without actually giving the user the equivalent of
> > providing a formatting function (in the form of a markup command):
even
> > a format string requires a certain order of elements.
> >
> > We might provide a stock formatting function that consults the
details
> > and thus can cater for the most common use cases.  But trying to
capture
> > all is just going to make for an incomprehensible and complex
interface
> > that still does not work for all use cases.

> I'm so glad you said this! This is exactly what I suggested to Harm
(off-line),
> and I think it's precisely the way to accomplish the best of all
possible
> worlds.

On the tracker I posted a more elaborated code.
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5215/#e472


https://codereview.appspot.com/327620043/