Re: The limits of StaffGroup nesting

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > On 11/12/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > Trevor Bača wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, both for ease of implementation -- and because actual composers
> > > > seem to bar and bracket things quite arbitrarily -- maybe the request
> > > > shouldn't be for arbitrarily nested contexts, but instead to free up
> > > > barring and bracketting as independent tasks from each other. Dunno,
> > > > but something to think about when it comes time to add to the sponsor
> > > > page.
> > >
> > > Yes, this seems sensible. 
>
>
> Does this mean that cycles will be allowed in the graph of context 
> definitions?

No, it means that we don't mirror bracket nesting in context nesting.

--
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen