Re: Compound time auto-beaming problem

[Matt Huber]

Wow.  I'm going to have to parse that syntax to see what it's doing.  I think that using that method to beam will be less effort than just manually beaming.

Thanks for all the advice, I really appreciate it.

~Matt

On 9/12/06, Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden> wrote:

Joe Neeman wrote:
>
> I think Mats may have misunderstood what you wanted. You want the
> following beaming, yes?
> a8[ r16 r8 a16] a8[ r16 r8 a16]
>
> If so, I don't think the automatic-beaming can help you; I don't think
> there is a way to tell it to ignore rests while making up beams.
>
Thanks for the clarification. There is actually a way to get
automatic beams over rests, but you don't want to use it:

<<{a8*5/2 a16 a8*5/2 a16}\\{s8 r16 r8 s16 s8 r16 r8 }>>

   /Mats