|
| From: | Trevor Bača |
| Subject: | Re: Glissando notation? |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:12:00 -0600 |
On 1/31/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
Trevor Bača escreveu: > 1. The heavy lifting of the program implemented in (compiled) C++ code > with tweaks being made in (interpreted, dynamic) Scheme code. > Capitalized names in lily input generally refer to the C++ guts while > other properties in overrides talk directly to the Scheme code. Beyond do you mean \consists "Foo_engraver" ?
Yup.
It might make sense to mangle those names, so we have uniform, scheme style naming for that too.
Agreed. -- Trevor Bača address@hidden
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |