lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: info about controlling direciton / placement


From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: RE: info about controlling direciton / placement
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:18:52 -0000

I'd go with (2).  Good idea.  It permits a better
explanation of the general concept of 'direction (up,
center, down, left, right and the uses of numerical values)
and the various commands which use it (\..up, \..down,
\..neutral).

I'd support this as a general principle for (some) other
properties too - 'color, 'stencil, 'thickness, etc.  In
fact, pretty well everything in the grob-interface, and
maybe several other generally used interfaces too.  That
might justify a separate chapter, perhaps sectioned like
interfaces?  (Yes, Graham - later, maybe much later - but if
we know this is where we're heading we can avoid editing up
this sort of stuff in individual sections now :)

Trevor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> address@hidden Behalf Of
> Graham Percival
> Sent: 14 February 2008 23:02
> To: lilypond-user Mailinglist
> Subject: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement
>
>
> GDP page:
> http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
>
>
> About half the subsections in NR 1 and 2 are
> about material whose
> direction can be controlled.  ie ^ _, along with \fooUp
> \fooNeutral, and \override Foo #'direction.
>
> There's two ways we could handle this info:
> 1)  Add an explanation and example of controlling
> the placement in
> every one of these subsections.
>
> 2)  Add one sentence with a link to a central place which
> discusses directions.
>
>
> I prefer #2, of course; it makes the docs easier
> to maintain, and
> frankly easier to read as well -- there's no
> point in having
> duplicate material in tons of subsections.
>
> There's an example of this in NR 1.2.1.4 Ties  at
> the moment.
> About halfway down the page, just before the "Predefined
> commands", there's the sample sentence+link that
> I was suggesting
> in #2, along with the old material which would be deleted.
>
>
> If there's a huge outcry about this, particularly from doc
> helpers, then I'm prepared to go with #1 instead
> -- but I want the
> docs to be consistent.  Either they all have such
> examples, or
> none.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]