Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

[Trevor Daniels]

Valentin wrote:
> Perhaps Accordion (and not "Accordian") should go into Wind instruments?

Thanks - corrected.

and
> If we decide to add "bowing indications" in Strings, we should
> consider adding "Breathing indications" to Wind instruments, shouldn't
> we?

Mats wrote:
> I've often seen breathing indications both in string music as well as 
> vocal
> music.

There is a section 1.3.2.3 Breath marks already in Expressive marks.  Is
this adequate?  Does something need to be added to it?  Or do we need
a section under every instrument in NR 2?  Bowing indication are different
from the breathing comma, and are justified in NR 2, I think.  If we ever
added an organ section we might need some pedaling indications for the
pedal organ, though (plus registrations).

Trevor D