[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string number problem
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: string number problem |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:59:11 -0700 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:56:11 +0100
"Neil Puttock" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2008/8/18 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > Are there any other items reporting warnings with avoid-slur in
> > the bug tracker? Unfortunately we have a policy of
> > **not including** bugs about warnings, because there are so many
> > of them. Hopefully we can get enough people working on bugs
> > (without harming the doc team) that it makes sense to start
> > recording such reports as well...
>
> It is slightly unfortunate that bugs about warnings aren't included;
> very occasionally, they turn out to be serious errors which might have
> been missed.
I agree, but the instructions were explicit: if the output looks
good, don't add any bugs about warning messages.
Now that you're here, maybe we can get those instructions changed.
:)
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: string number problem, (continued)
- Re: string number problem, Graham Percival, 2008/08/18
- Re: string number problem, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/08/18
- Re: string number problem, Neil Puttock, 2008/08/18
- Re: string number problem, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/08/18
- Re: string number problem, Graham Percival, 2008/08/18
- Re: string number problem, Neil Puttock, 2008/08/18
- Re: string number problem,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: string number problem, Neil Puttock, 2008/08/18
- Re: string number problem, Graham Percival, 2008/08/18
Re: string number problem, Tom Cloyd, 2008/08/18
FW: string number problem, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/08/19