Re: Harmonic question

[Trevor Daniels]

John

I've now added a ref to Harmonics in References for for fretted strings in
NR 2.4.1.  Do you think this is adequate?

Trevor

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden>
To: "John Mandereau" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: Harmonic question


> John Mandereau wrote Monday, December 29, 2008 11:01 PM
>
>
> > Le lundi 29 décembre 2008 à 22:53 +0000, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
> > > Yes.  The warning under Harmonics in 2.3.1 in the Notation Reference 
> > > says:
> > >
> > > "Note: Harmonics must be defined inside a chord construct even if there 
> > > is
> > > only a single note."
> >
> > Should we add copy this warning into "Common notation for fretted
> > strings" or add there a "See also" reference to 2.3.1?
>
> Good point.  I'll add a pointer for harmonics to the "References for 
> fretted
> strings section
>
> > I know about the "no duplicate information" rule but I feel like a "See
> > also" might not be enough.
>
> I think a clear annotated reference for harmonics will be adequate.
>
> > John
>
> Trevor
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user