Re: (de)cresendi syntax

[Frédéric Bron]

> Attached is a sample file to show how the definition of spanners could work
> with my patch. I've also implemented two functions to give the text of the
> spanner directly in the postfix call.

When I look at your dynamic_spanners_postfix.pdf file, it seems to me
that on the second line (with the functions that take the text as an
argument), the cresc starts on the following note, not on the previous
note. Am I wrong?

Frédéric