[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new website: draft 3
From: |
Tim Reeves |
Subject: |
Re: new website: draft 3 |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:27:49 -0700 |
On Jun 29, 2009, at 12:48 AM, chip wrote:
Tim McNamara wrote:
On Jun 28, 2009, at 2:55 AM, chip wrote:
I think there is obviously far too much white space, also the same on the
Downloads page.
I disagree and find that most web pages have too much stuff crammed into
them, usually so much that it's hard to find the information one is
looking for. I like the simplicity of the page and I don't even think the
separator lines are necessary. If you want to see the mother of layout
nightmares, look at the GoDaddy.com pages. Jeebus, those suck.
I agree with you, but, there is a happy medium. I think the Manuals page
is it.
Well, there's naturally going to be more information on the documentation
pages than on the home page, the downloads pages, etc. The home page and
the download page are going to have more white space as a result. How is
this a problem?
I thing it's also important to minimize the use of Javascript (unless
you're doing Ajax), drop-down menus, etc. Most of that stuff can be done
with HTML which loads faster and works with more browsers more
predictably. Avoid cute for the sake of cute. Usability is the thing of
key importance and not how nifty people will think the code is.
Again, I agree. There are ways to get drop-down menus without javascript,
which I think should be, and can be, avoided for the entire site.
Usability is the number 1 priority indeed, but appearance has to be up
there as well. A simple site that looks attractive and contains a well
balanced design can still be a very usable site. Lilypond is a very
impressive program, and an overly simplistic web site would do it no
justice whatsoever. IMHO.
I prefer "elegant" to "overly simplistic." ;-)
And personally I think that dropdown (and whatever one calls the same
thing popping out horizontally) menus on web pages should be avoided,
period. I hate the damn things. YMMV, etc.
I happen to agree with Tim ;-) on this one: I'm viewing at 1900x1200 and I
think the amount of white space is good in the present layout. I also
generally don't like dropdown menus and rollover "features". I don't like
having to guess where things are or go on Easter egg hunts.
Finally, I think FAQs belong in the Introduction section not Infrequent
Use even though it's true that they are not something that a person refers
to more than a few times. OTOH, is the AU really a regular use item? Seems
more like Infrequent Use to me. I know I've looked at it about 2 or 3
times. Just my 2 cents.
Tim Reeves
- Re: new website: draft 3, (continued)
Re: new website: draft 3, Graham Percival, 2009/06/29
Re: new website: draft 3, Mark Knoop, 2009/06/29
Re: new website: draft 3,
Tim Reeves <=