[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: website so close, and yet so far
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: website so close, and yet so far |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:58:23 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:31:19AM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Sorry - I wanted to tweak it, but I was busy and finally forgot.
>
> I have added a function which takes care of glissandi between
> two equal note head positions. If I can manage to automatically
> take the accidentals into account, this would be even more helpful.
> But this is another story...
>
> So here it is, with crude tweaks and hack, but it looks better than
> before, I think ;-)
Thanks! Any possibility of adding a minimum-length to the
glissandi? Some of them are really hard to spot.
Also, why not use \fermata ? I don't think it would change
anything, but the code looks a bit weird. And do you have any
idea why there's so many clashing note columns? Is that a normal
message for tab stuff?
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, (continued)
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Graham Percival, 2009/10/31
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Frank Steinmetzger, 2009/10/29
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/10/29
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/29
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Federico Bruni, 2009/10/30
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/30
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Graham Percival, 2009/10/30
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Marc Hohl, 2009/10/31
- Re: website so close, and yet so far,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Neil Puttock, 2009/10/31
- Re: website so close, and yet so far, Marc Hohl, 2009/10/31
Re: website so close, and yet so far, Ian Hulin, 2009/10/24