[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:33:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 09:35:02AM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> But then I was informed of Graham's #(make-dynamic-extra ...) function,
> which I use now and which has no drawback at all (to what I know).
>
> – the dynamic is considered as a dynamic (in MIDI output too);
> – the dynamic is correctly aligned (X-centered on the note), without
> having to play with "translate" values (huge improvement compared
> to solution 5);
> – no other drawback.
IIRC it has one drawback:
- it "reserves" blank space in front of the "mp dolce" (in
particular, half the length of the "mp dolce")
I forget exactly why, but I ran into this problem a few months
after I started using it. In many cases it doesn't matter, though
(which is why I didn't discover it for months).
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Xavier Scheuer, 2010/04/24
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/04/25
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Xavier Scheuer, 2010/04/25
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/04/26
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/26
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Xavier Scheuer, 2010/04/27
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Nick Payne, 2010/04/27
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/04/27
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc, Xavier Scheuer, 2010/04/28
- Re: [PATCH] Re: syntax change for \cresc,
Graham Percival <=