[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Odd output
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Odd output |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:34:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Ellis <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes! Spelling does count because poorly spelled music is much harder
> to read. I'm somewhat less convinced regarding sonic differences on
> untempered instruments because the matter is more complicated than
> that, e.g G# as the leading tone to A is different from G# as the
> third of E. In practice, it comes down to the performer's ear to make
> those distinctions.
I have asked someone about a "quint register" in a virtual accordion,
and while I have not heard it myself, his opinion is that this register
is a _tempered_ fifth above the normal sound (namely, "in scale").
I tend to believe him, even though it would imply that someone had no
clue about what he is supposed to be doing (or did not have the
material/samples to do this properly). I've long ago come to the
painful realization that it is a mistake to rule out that possibility.
I am not sure that a performer with a manually-pitchable instrument will
overly obey enharmonic information against his own ear. Writing
functionally, however, will help with recognizing chord patterns. There
are curious things like keyboards (cembali, I think) with split black
keys that can be tuned to make use of that distinction, but I would
suppose that the players of such rare beasts are versed enough to apply
the right choice even against notation.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Odd output, Tim McNamara, 2010/12/10
Re: Odd output, Keith OHara, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Phil Holmes, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Keith OHara, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Michael Ellis, 2010/12/17
- RE: Odd output, James Lowe, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Michael Ellis, 2010/12/17
- Re: Odd output, Neil Puttock, 2010/12/17