lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: connectArpeggios in TabStaff


From: Peter Crighton
Subject: Re: connectArpeggios in TabStaff
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 00:02:34 +0200

There's nothing in the LSR that would solve my problem inside a TabStaff. (Well, apart from Positioning Arpeggios, which is what I use now… but it's a lot of work positioning every single arpeggio.)

You're right, applying connectArpeggios doesn't work for me as I don't want cross-staff arpeggios.

I unfortunately have to enter the music twice as there are corrections needed for the TabStaff (like positioning the arpeggios).

Anyway, thanks for your suggestions!

2011/5/3 Federico Bruni <address@hidden>
Il giorno mar, 03/05/2011 alle 17.22 +0200, Peter Crighton ha scritto:
> Is it possible to connect arpeggios between two different voices in a
> TabStaff?
> I can get the desired output by overriding Arpeggio #'positions, but
> I'd like to have a more intuitive way, something like
> \set TabStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
> Is there a better way, am I just missing something?
>
>
> Also I'd like to know why I have to put an \RemoveEmptyStaffContext in
> the layout in order to get Span_arpeggio_engraver to work.
> For most of my scores I need \RemoveEmptyStaffContext, which is why it
> was there in the first place. I don't need it for the current one
> though, so I'd like to leave it out, but then the whole Arpeggio
> connecting doesn't work anymore.
>
>
> See the attachment for my (reduced) code. (By the way, the problem
> exists in 2.13.61 as well.)
> _______________________________________________

Have you tried some of the snippets in the LSR?
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Search?q=arpeggio

If you apply connectArpeggios to the Score context you can comment
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext, but I guess that the result is not what you
are expecting.

BTW, why entering the music twice, once for Staff and once for TabStaff?
See attached example.

Cheers,
Federico


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]