[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: polychords: a working solution
|
From: |
Tim McNamara |
|
Subject: |
Re: polychords: a working solution |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:43:03 -0600 |
On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:07 PM, James wrote:
> Attached is the output
Those look good! "Nice job" to the OP!
But for that last chord with all the "add" stuff- is that the default output?
Yuck. The repetitive use of the word "add" should not happen, although I have
no clue how to fix it and offer a solution so I should stop bitching...
- polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, James, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution,
Tim McNamara <=
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Carl Sorensen, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Tim McNamara, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/05
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/05
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/16
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/17