Re: polychords: a working solution

[Tim McNamara]

On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:

> 
> 
> On 2/3/12 1:43 PM, "Tim McNamara" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>>      
>> On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:07 PM, James wrote:
>> 
>>> Attached is the output
>> 
>> Those look good!  "Nice job" to the OP!
>> 
>> But for that last chord with all the "add" stuff- is that the default
>> output?  Yuck.  The repetitive use of the word "add" should not happen,
>> although I have no clue how to fix it and offer a solution so I should
>> stop bitching...
>> 
> 
> The latest development version eliminates all the "add" stuff.

Nice development, thanks for the heads up on that!