[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:20:45 +0100 |
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm happy (and also proud) to be able to announce a new release of my
> lilyglyphs LaTeX package.
> While I label it version 0.2 I am convinced that it is the first release
> that is really useable, so I consider this the initial 'public' release.
Congratulations - this is really great work! I wish i had some LaTeX
documents with musical symbols to typeset so that i could play with it
:)
thanks,
Janek
- lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Urs Liska, 2012/11/10
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Urs Liska, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Thomas Morley, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Urs Liska, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Thomas Morley, 2012/11/11
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Urs Liska, 2012/11/12
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Noeck, 2012/11/12
- Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Noeck, 2012/11/12
Re: lilyglyphs 0.2 - First 'official' release, Damian leGassick, 2012/11/15