Re: Vertical position of rests on a custom staff

[David Kastrup]

Paul Morris <address@hidden> writes:

> After getting that working I checked to see if anything changed
> between v. 2.16 to 2.17.19 And I'm really glad to say that in 2.17.19
> the positioning of the rests was almost exactly what I wanted by
> default!  The only ones that needed re-positioning were the rarer ones
> that were longer than a whole rest.  Also the dots on about half of
> the rests also still needed re-positioning.

Could you elaborate?

-- 
David Kastrup