Re: Editors

lilypond-user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Editors

From:	Wim van Dommelen
Subject:	Re: Editors
Date:	Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:35:36 +0200

On 25 Jun 2013, at 18:39 , Tim Slattery wrote:

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

A little late but count +1 for me Jan.....

Elm, which this guy loves, is an ancient, text-based email client.

Not relevant, the principle holds with all mailers. I use a graphical email program and I have two butteons, with -- guess what? --: Reply-To and Reply-All .... and I do sometimes use the Reply-To on purpose, and yes, sometimes erronously. Bad luck, I just correct that and apologiese(?)

Regards,

Wim.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Editors, (continued)
- Re: Editors, flup2, 2013/06/25
- Message not available
  - Re: Editors, Tim McNamara, 2013/06/25
    - Re: Editors, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2013/06/25
    - Re: Editors, Tim Slattery, 2013/06/25
    - Re: Editors, David Kastrup, 2013/06/25
    - Re: Editors, Joram Berger, 2013/06/25
    - Re: Editors, Urs Liska, 2013/06/26
    - Re: Editors, Martin Tarenskeen, 2013/06/26
    - Re: Editors, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2013/06/25
    - Re: Editors, David Kastrup, 2013/06/25
    - Re: Editors, Wim van Dommelen <=

Prev by Date: Re: lilypond presentation
Next by Date: Re: Replacement suggestions for Century Schoolbook?
Previous by thread: Re: Editors
Next by thread: Web Server setup
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread