lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software


From: SoundsFromSound
Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 12:47:52 -0700 (PDT)

SCORE was amazing and practically limitless. Back in the DOS days.
Now, with "newer" versions of the program? I'd only use it if I was forced.

YMMV


Tim Reeves-3 wrote
>> Message: 9
>> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: SoundsFromSound <

> soundsfromsound@

> >
>> To: 

> lilypond-user@

>> Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
>> Message-ID: <

> address@hidden

>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> 
>> I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the
>> LilyPond mentions. 
>> As a former SCORE user, personally I can't possibly imagine /ever /going
>> back now that I've tried LilyPond. There truly is just no comparison.
>> Period. 
>> With LilyPond, you're only limited by your imagination.
>> 
> 
> That's funny. I always thought the one defining positive attribute of 
> SCORE was that you *could do anything* imaginable (music notation-wise) 
> with it. The drawback is that you *have to do everything* manually, one 
> note at a time...requires a lot more thinking, deciding.
> Whereas Lilypond has the best of both worlds - very good results 
> automatically, plus all the flexibility to do crazy stuff.
> 
> Tim Reeves
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list

> lilypond-user@

> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user





-----
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Steinberg-s-progress-report-on-new-notation-software-tp148842p148901.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]