Re: SMuFL

[Urs Liska]

Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> schrieb:

>Greetings List,
>
>On 10/08/13 6:57 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Of course this is all quite complex and difficult.
>Which is why this discussion thread is important, I reckon.
>> One thought:
>> Of course you can buy commercial fonts and use them with LaTeX.
>I use commercial fonts with the open source ConTeXT program.
>> But the free TeX distros won't for example packages that are "macros 
>> supporting non-free fonts".
>Can you explain that more?

Not right now.
Go to CTAN->upload. Either on that page or on the referenced "texlive 
contribution" page you'll find more details.

HTH
Urs

>>
>> Although I personally would like to have the option to use
>proprietary 
>> fonts with LilyPond.
>Not proprietary, but SMuFL fonts, commercially packaged! :-) Emmentaler
>
>is, in effect, proprietary, although free.
>
>Andrew
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.