Re: would 'gn' for G-natural be useful in \language "english" ?

[Shane Brandes]

American here, the "cn" is a waste of effort and more liable to muddle
things up.

regards,
Shane

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Ralph Palmer <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Keith OHara <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Dear list,
>> In English, pronouncing the 'natural' in 'C-natural' is required if the
>> note is out-of-key.  LilyPond does not consider the key when reading
>> note-input, but could easily accept 'cn' as a name for the pitch C-natural.
>> There was a feature request on the bug-list, that LilyPond do so.
>>
>> Among those responding to the proposal, the Americans were in favor, while
>> the British Germans Dutch and Flemish opposed.
>>
>> I have started using English note-entry with 'cn', etc., for naturals when
>> I would say "natural" and I find it helpful.  If anyone else will use it,
>> I'll push for it and put it in LilyPond.
>
>
> Hmm. . . . I am an American and I am opposed, for the reasons given in the
> previous discussion(s). My 2 cents.
>
> Thanks to all for your help and input,
>
> Ralph
>
> --
> Ralph Palmer
> Brattleboro, VT
> USA
> address@hidden
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>