[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative fonts glyph support
|
From: |
tisimst |
|
Subject: |
Re: Alternative fonts glyph support |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jan 2015 13:21:09 -0700 (MST) |
Urs Liska wrote
> Am 02.01.2015 um 20:35 schrieb tisimst:
>> No complaints? That's not a problem.
>
> Maybe this is because nobody (who noticed the post) really understands
> the implications?
>
> Urs
That's fair.
The implication is this: If you need to use more than the standard glyph set
(e.g., the common noteheads, clefs, articulations, time signature numerals,
accidentals, etc.) then you may have to use Emmentaler instead of, say,
Haydn, or at least a mixture of the two. The biggest examples of this are
the shape-note noteheads and ancient chant glyphs (i.e., petrucci, kievan,
etc.).
Does that make more sense?
-Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Alternative-fonts-glyph-support-tp169988p170043.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.