[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: slur syntax
From: |
Gianmaria Lari |
Subject: |
Re: slur syntax |
Date: |
Sat, 23 May 2015 15:19:03 -0700 (MST) |
Yes! Thank you Peter (and Urs), I think now it's clear!!!!
Lilypond use a "postfix" syntax. To apply a function 'f' to the note 'a' the
lilypond syntax is "a \f" and not viceversa. Because the open parenthese is
like a function (a function that marks the first item) it must be written as
for all the other function: after the note.
Of course, everything is possible, and we could make the lilypond parser
more complex and use the other notation for the slur issue. But this has
been considered not important :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax-tp176928p176957.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- slur syntax, Gianmaria Lari, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Urs Liska, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Gianmaria Lari, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Peter Bjuhr, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Peter Bjuhr, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax,
Gianmaria Lari <=
- Re: slur syntax, Michael Hendry, 2015/05/24
- Re: slur syntax, David Kastrup, 2015/05/24
- Re: slur syntax, Gianmaria Lari, 2015/05/25