|
From: | tisimst |
Subject: | Re: LilyJAZZ |
Date: | Sun, 23 Aug 2015 14:42:22 -0700 (MST) |
Also, looking at the web page that was referenced in other threads, it appears that the old LilyJAZZ font has been completely replaced (looking at the example lead sheet). To my eyes the old font was much better and I won’t be updating to the new version. The new version looks awkward and doesn’t visually flow very well. YMMV.
> On Aug 23, 2015, at 1:37 PM, Tim McNamara <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 23, 2015, at 6:56 AM, BB <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> Does anybody sucessful use LilyJAZZ?
>
> Yes, I have been using it for over a year with excellent results, although there are some quirks. For example, it kills bar numbering. It also interferes with \improvisationOn and I have to turn off LilyJazz to be able to use that.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyJAZZ-tp179970p180026.htmlTo start a new topic under User, email <a href="" target="_blank">address@hidden
To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here.
NAML
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |