[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Augmentation dots reg test
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Augmentation dots reg test |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2016 22:07:53 +0200 (CEST) |
>>What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than
>>stacked notes? E.g. << <f a b c>4. // <a e,>2. >> (untested).
>>
>>I think from previous test cases it may become difficult to
>>understand which dots behind to which notes. IIRC there's an
>>outstanding bug about horizontal positioning in this situation.
>
> Here is the output of your test case. How would you like this to
> appear?
Easy to answer: There should be a larger horizontal gap between the
two chords, and the dots for the lower-voice chord should be put into
this space.
Maybe this could even be done automatically if the distance between
the notehead and its dot exceeds a certain limit.
Werner