[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \mark and slur
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: \mark and slur |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Sep 2017 21:49:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> If I understand correctly, with this patch [issue 5581] things like
>> below are now possible:
>>
>> xxx = c4
>> { \xxx -- }
>
> Yes.
>
>> and
>> #{ $m -. #}
>
> Yes. #m -. should be fine as well.
>>
>> Which is a big, big goody!
>
> Well, it's mostly convenience that allows using LilyPond syntax instead
> of Scheme.
And, uh, it is lacking regtests and documentation. Because someone for
some reason finds it less challenging to implement functionality than
inventing examples using it...
If you are testing things out anyway, at least regtests should not be
too far away...
--
David Kastrup
- Re: \mark and slur, (continued)
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/18
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/18
- Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), David Kastrup, 2017/09/22
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur), Thomas Morley, 2017/09/22
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, David Kastrup, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23
- Re: Regtest for issue 5181, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/23