Re: [OT] Linux Users

[David Kastrup]

Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 19.11.2017 um 17:55 schrieb Malte Meyn:
>>> I would love to see an introduction to that toolchain on
>>> lilypondblog.org. Jacques, would you write such a post, please?
>>
>> That would be nice. 
>
> Communication has already started ;-)
>
>> And maybe, if or when this has been tested enough by different users
>> on different systems, it could become part of the official lilypond
>> releases? I’m not sure whether this could be done without manual
>> installation of the files in a directory that can be seen by LaTeX …
>> But at least a mention in the docs would be nice.
>
> As far as I can tell the cleanest (and easiest) way would be to
> publish the package on CTAN so it will be included in TeX distros like
> TeXLive (like it is the case with lilyglyphs). *Then* of course it
> should be mentioned in the LilyPond docs too.

I fail to see why it uses different syntax for embedding LilyPond code
than lilypond-book does, though.  Why not make it compatible by just
adding the right \usepackage invocation?

-- 
David Kastrup