|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: [OT] Linux Users |
Date: | Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:03:00 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
Am 19.11.2017 um 23:43 schrieb Br. Samuel Springuel:
On 2017-11-19 5:28 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote:Font selection, language support, UTF-8 input…All of these are supported in LuaTeX/LuaLaTeX. For some key differences see this:https://www.overleaf.com/blog/500-whats-in-a-name-a-guide-to-the-many-flavours-of-tex#keyfeatures
There's one feature that sets LuaLaTeX apart from XeLaTeX for my use cases, and that's the compatibility of the 'microtype' package. While it works with XeTeX it offers a limited feature set - and that package with LuaTeX provides (at least for me) those last 5% of beautiful typesetting.
However, this comes at a cost: both XeTeX and LuaTeX work *substantially* slower than pdfTeX. I'm always stunned how fast "ordinary" compilation can be with LaTeX, for example when simply pushing a Markdown document through Pandoc.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |