Re: cadenza when having multiple staffs

[Edmundo Carmona Antoranz]

Actually, it didn't take me long to test it. It's spot on. Thanks!
Will let you know when I upload it into its repo.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:18 PM Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your feedback. Let me give it a try and will let you know
> how it went.
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:01 AM Andrew Bernard <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
> > My thoughts exactly.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 15:55, Aaron Hill <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> It is not a cadenza, per se, but rather an omission of tuplet numbering.
> >>   The piece seems to omit tuplet numbering in nearly all cases, rather
> >> relying solely on beaming groups to indicate the timing.
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user