Re: [Ltib] libXt "failed dependencies"

[Stuart Hughes]

Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On 7/14/09, Stuart Hughes <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > I can explain the difference in behaviour.  When running -m scdeploy,
> > the rpm file in installed with a "fabricated" spec file that has:
> >
> > Autoreqprov     : no
> >
> > This effectively disables the provides/requires checks that happen in a
> > normal run.  This is something you would want during package development.
> >
> > The real question is why you're failing this dependency.  Run:
> >
> > ls -l rootfs/libc*
>
> It appears ok:
> $ ls -l rootfs/lib/libc*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1352528 2007-05-09 15:27 rootfs/lib/libc-2.5.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      17 2009-07-09 13:26
> rootfs/lib/libcom_err.so.2 -> libcom_err.so.2.1
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   27734 2009-07-09 13:26 rootfs/lib/libcom_err.so.2.1
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   26252 2007-05-09 15:27 rootfs/lib/libcrypt-2.5.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      15 2009-07-09 13:18
> rootfs/lib/libcrypt.so.1 -> libcrypt-2.5.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      11 2009-07-09 13:18 rootfs/lib/libc.so.6
> -> libc-2.5.so
>
> > You should see libc.so.6 in there and it should be a link to a real file
> > (for example: libc-2.3.6.so).  If it is not there, then base_libs has
> > not been installed.  If it is, then for some reason base_libs has not
> > inserted this provide into the rpm database.  You can check with:
> > rpm --root `pwd`/rootfs -q base_libs --provides | grep libc.so
>
> It returns ok as well:
>
> $ rpm --root `pwd`/rootfs -q base_libs --provides | grep libc.so
> libc.so.6
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.5)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_PRIVATE)
>
> To make sure there is any issue on my system I installed a virtual
> machine (Ubuntu 9.04) and started from scratch and the same error
> again.
>
> Do you have any idea to solve it?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Alan

In your previous email, the install was failing as these dependencies 
were not met:

error: failed dependencies:
        libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)   is needed by libXt-1.0.4-5
        libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)   is needed by libXt-1.0.4-5


However, your base_libs are only providing 2.4/2.5/private.  That looks 
a bit suspect, I normally get a load more (including 2.0/2.1).

Which BSP are you working on and which toolchain  does it select (maybe 
you can attached your platforms .config).

You could try running ./ltib -p base_libs -f and then re-check what it 
provides.  The dependency in Xt looks reasonable to me.

Regards, Stuart