lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-devel] [task #10088] Correctly implement close() vs. shutdown()


From: Simon Goldschmidt
Subject: [lwip-devel] [task #10088] Correctly implement close() vs. shutdown()
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:44:22 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; de; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6

Follow-up Comment #5, task #10088 (project lwip):

> close() should also send a RST if there are any data already 
> received but not yet delivered to the application

Does shutdown(SHUT_RDWR) also do that?

> To do this we need to make additions to the sockets and netconn 
> layers to allow access to "how much data is buffered on receive 
> for this connection" at each layer, so we can decide what the 
> appropriate behaviour is.

We already have that information: the application tells TCP about that by
calling tcp_recved(). Isn't it enought to check the receive window? If it has
the initial size, no more data should be buffered at higher levels.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?10088>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]