[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving
From: |
Craig Graham |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:23:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6 |
On Monday 11 October 2004 11:19, K.J. Mansley wrote:
> The only way I could see this breaking down is if the TCP segment size
> is similar to the TCP window size. Then, a single segment will close
> the whole window, needing an ACK to open it again before any other
> segments can be sent, but the ACK is delayed waiting for another
> segment. If that is the cause of the problem, I would class it as a
> misconfiguration (the max segment size should not be as large as the
> window) rather than a bug in lwIP.
>
> Could you check what your TCP_WND and TCP_MSS are set to?
My TCP_MSS=1024, with TCP_WND=8096, so that's probably not the problem.....
> Thanks
>
> Kieran
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/16
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving,
Craig Graham <=
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Sigurd Vindenes, 2004/10/27