[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors.
From: |
Nick Thomas |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors. |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:58:56 +0100 |
>
> Often the checksum is added by the hardware and Wireshark never sees it -
> hence it flags errors. There is an option in Wireshark to ignore these
> errors. In my experience it is very normal to see errors in
> Wireshark, only
> to find that if you step through the code the checksums verify with no
> problem.
>
> Regards,
> Richard.
>
Hi Richard, thanks for the reply.
So, wireshark report may be a red-herring.
But, I still have a real problem, in that the HTTP response doesn't come
back to the PC based browser.
It is these responses that wireshark is moaning about, surely not a
coincidence?
Regards
- [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., Nick Thomas, 2008/09/19
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., Jonathan Larmour, 2008/09/19
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., FreeRTOS.org Info, 2008/09/19
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors.,
Nick Thomas <=
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., address@hidden, 2008/09/19
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., Nick Thomas, 2008/09/19
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., address@hidden, 2008/09/20
- RE: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., Nick Thomas, 2008/09/22
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., address@hidden, 2008/09/22
Re: [lwip-users] TCP Checksum errors., zhenfeng ren, 2008/09/19