[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Mar 1997 16:44:39 -0500 (EST) |
> 970309 Philip Webb wrote:
> > and while we're on the subject, how much smaller would Lynx be
> > if there were a reduced version omitting security/anonymity/etc
> > from the code altogether?
> > isn't that an important direction in which to move?
> > the fact that Lynx was originally developed for multi-user systems
> > doesn't mean that's where its future lies.
> 970309 Hynek Med replied:
> Well, I don't think it would be that much smaller..
> IMHO, it's not worth the work with ifdef-ing the anonymous stuff..
>
> BTW, what do you mean by security? From lynx you can do what you can do
> from your shell account, the only trouble with security is not to let the
> anonymous do what he wants (i.e. gain the shell/read local files etc.).
> I can't think of any security things that could be left our of lynx at
> this moment.. Can you give me an example?
simply flipping thro' lynx.cfg reveals:
ALWAYS_TRUSTED_EXEC LOCAL_EXECUTION_LINKS_ON_BUT_NOT_REMOTE
CAN_ANONYMOUS_JUMP TRUSTED_LYNXCGI
there's also 100s of lines about dired, printers, viewers etc,
which are surely not needed by a single user, who simply exit/suspends Lynx
& does what s/he always does in his own machine/directory.
if all of this were removed from the source,
surely Lynx would be much smaller?
the whole Lynx set-up is heavily biassed towards multi-user environments,
which IMHO is increasingly out-of-date.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Roger Hill, 1997/03/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/03/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/03/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Hiram Lester, Jr., 1997/03/05
- LYNX-DEV Re: Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Roger Hill, 1997/03/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Userdefs.h and Lynx.cfg consolidation, Philip Webb, 1997/03/09