[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour
From: |
Sven Hartge |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:27:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.14-20020926 ("Soil") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.19-109 (i586)) |
"Sonja Paszeska" <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: "Sven Hartge" <address@hidden>
>> What good would it do, to say you support protocol 61 if mldonkey is
>> only capable to "speak" 59?
> I once heard that some servers block clients with a version < 61.
More servers block mldonkey because it is mldonkey and not because of
the lower protocol version.
Doing so would decimate the whole donkey network to about a tenth of its
size, because many users of the official client use an older version.
Setting mldonkey to a higher protocol revision than it originally speaks
is Bad Thing[tm], because then you may get communication errors between
the servers or peer clients and your client resulting in an abortion of
the connection, which is just the opposite of what you wanted to achive
by setting the revision to a higher number in the first place.
S°
--
BOFH excuse #415:
Maintence window broken
Message not available
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Strange Behaviour, Sonja Paszeska, 2002/11/24
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Strange Behaviour, Martin, 2002/11/24
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour, Sven Hartge, 2002/11/24
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour, Sonja Paszeska, 2002/11/25
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour, Michael Panteleit, 2002/11/25
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour, Sonja Paszeska, 2002/11/25
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour, Sven Hartge, 2002/11/25
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour, Michael Panteleit, 2002/11/25
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Strange Behaviour, Sven Hartge, 2002/11/25