[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark
|
From: |
spiralvoice |
|
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:28:08 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Xnews/06.07.17 |
On Do 05 Feb 2004 01:11:15a spiralvoice wrote:
> First tests show that the new method works good here. Now I can scan
> some bigger files which are sitting on NTFS...
Hi,
scanned successfully, got an increase from 45-70%:-) on several GB of
data.
Greetings, spiralvoice
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Bug in Overnet source handling causes being banned, (continued)
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, spiralvoice, 2004/02/04
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/04
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, spiralvoice, 2004/02/04
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, b8_bavard, 2004/02/05
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, spiralvoice, 2004/02/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/05
- [Mldonkey-users] [PATCH] new Sha1 implementation, Fortin Denis, 2004/02/07
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Re: Sha1 implementation benchmark,
spiralvoice <=