Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
Are branch names in the form of peeps.com/branch going to be supported
in v0.17?
I think this type of branch name basically works now, I just created a
test database and committed one revision in the branch foo.com/bar and
it worked fine. I've also had a brief look at the netsync collections
code and all it's really doing is looking for matching prefixes so I
expect that serving the foo.com "collection" here would include the
foo.com/bar branch. I haven't tested this though so I'm not completely
certain that netsync will be happy.
Is there something in particular that *doesn't* work with this type of
branch name at the moment? Or are you thinking more along the lines of
netsync in terms of branch globs rather than collections?
As far as I know there hasn't been any work done on the branch globbing
idea yet so don't expect to see that in 0.17 when it lands.
HTH,
Derek