[Monotone-devel] Re: glibc 2.2. version?

[Henry Nestler]

Deliverable Mail wrote:

> How about a static version then?
>
> Cheers,
> Alexy
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:57:15 -0800, Nathaniel Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:34:05PM -0500, Deliverable Mail wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone please precompile a glibc 2.2 binary for all those good
> > > ol' linuxi out there?  I think the one available for download should
> > > be marked as glibc 2.3.
> >
> > It's now so marked.  (No 2.2 system here to build on, though, sorry.)
> >
> > -- Nathaniel

I have alltimes the same problem.

Dan from www.colinux.org have helped me and compiled a full static 
binary, but only version 0.16. This works good on all my systems (SuSE 
7.1, 9.0, Fedora Core 2, Red Hat).

Please, please, compile with full static!

--
Henry Nestler