Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: monotone-viz oddities again?

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

In message <address@hidden> on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:59:21 +0100, Bruce Stephens 
<address@hidden> said:

monotone> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <address@hidden> writes:
monotone> 
monotone> [...]
monotone> 
monotone> > Ah, no, but you didn't have a chance to see what I see
monotone> > before now.  Just pull and look again and you'll see what
monotone> > I mean (unless someone else pushes something new...).
monotone> 
monotone> Ah, I see.  Now 7e8d1d331d6fd71d84b0db6b48de9265371b6541
monotone> isn't regarded as a leaf, because it's been propagated to
monotone> another branch.
monotone> 
monotone> And that's likely to be common (and *is* common, looking at
monotone> the graph), so regarding all such branch-crossings to be
monotone> leaves wouldn't work.

Absolutely, it has happened more than once.  However, the visual
oddity that you see right now hasn't been visible before, because we
don't have a disconnected graph very often, so we usually see the leaf
at the bottom, propagates or not.  So it's not really as much of a
problem as the current "disconnectedness".

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         address@hidden
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis