[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Inconsistent behaviour and others: clone vs. pull
From: |
Thomas Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Inconsistent behaviour and others: clone vs. pull |
Date: |
Thu, 01 May 2008 20:12:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) |
Dennis Schridde schrieb:
(1)
I noticed an inconsistent behaviour between clone and pull:
clone by default uses a key to connect to the host, while pull does not.
Fixed in c0281bd13c978c17a44d81c268a4f5fe22f0000f.
(2)
The fact that the server does not know they I try to authenticate with is
denote with this cryptic message:
mtn: warning: protocol error while processing peer monotone.ca: 'received
network error: remote public key
hash '9625eeea718bd974563ddedde9ff00e3195449a9' is unknown'
Could not change that without rewriting parts of netsync I probably do
not fully understand - so not a quick hack :-/
Whenever "nuskool" (the highly anticipated, new network protocol) gets
ready, we should think about this problem again and fix it early enough.
(3)
clone takes a -b argument to specify the branch, while pull wants it as a
normal argument.
Fixed in c0281bd13c978c17a44d81c268a4f5fe22f0000f as well.
(4)
There doesnt seem to be an obvious way to make clone connect anonymously.
This was actually a bug, because not even --key "" worked. Thanks for
reporting!
Thomas.
--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature