[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1
From: |
Richard Levitte |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:55:27 +0100 (CET) |
In message <address@hidden> on Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:56:40 -0500, Hendrik Boom
<address@hidden> said:
hendrik> Unfortunately, even with libbotan1.7 and libbotan1.7-dev installed,
when
hendrik> running .'configure I still get
hendrik>
hendrik> checking for botan... no
hendrik> botan.pc not found
hendrik> checking for botan using botan-config... yes
hendrik> checking whether botan is usable... no
hendrik> configure: *** botan_CFLAGS=
hendrik> configure: *** botan_LIBS=-L/usr/lib -lm -lbz2 -lcrypto -lgmp
-lpthread
hendrik> -lrt -lz -lbotan
hendrik> configure: error: in `/farhome/hendrik/dv/monotone/monotone-0.99.1':
hendrik> configure: error: Must be able to compile and link programs against
hendrik> botan.
hendrik> See `config.log' for more details
hendrik>
[...]
hendrik>
hendrik> Searching the Debian package data base
hendrik> http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
hendrik> fails to find any packages in stable containing a file named botan.pc
That's not the issue. libbotan1.7 contains the program botan-config,
which can be used as well, and if you look again, it was used and
correctly identified botan for you.
However, a few lines further down, there's this:
hendrik> conftest.cpp -lz -L/usr/lib -lm -lbz2 -lcrypto -lgmp -lpthread -lrt
-lz
hendrik> -lbotan >&5
hendrik> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto
That's where the problem is...
Quite honestly, though, I'm a bit surprised this should happen at
all. libbotan1.7 depends on libssl0.9.8, which delivers libcrypto...
So the question is, what's up with that?
Cheers,
Richard
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!"
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish
- [Monotone-devel] minor documentation bug in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1,
Richard Levitte <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05