[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:54:37 -0800 |
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Markus Wanner <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 05:48 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Richard Levitte <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Why should libbotan1.7-dev need to depend on libssl-dev?
>>
>> It's botan-config that adds -lcrypto to the link line, so it's
>> libbotan1.7-dev's responsibility to ensure that the bare
>> "libcrypto.so" symlink exists, which would be accomplished by
>> depending on libssl-dev.
>
> I think you are mixing -dev and non-dev packages. libbotan1.7-dev
> doesn't depend on any other -dev package. While libbotan1.7 very well
> depends on libssl0.9.8 (but still not libssl-dev) (on lenny, that is).
>
> On squeeze, I'm able to compile monotone (c2d9a013..) just fine without
> having libssl-dev installed (but with libssl0.9.8).
If that works correctly, then whatever added -lcrypto to the link line
is wrong. Which would be libbotan1.7-dev again, if I understood the
config.log snippet right.
zw
- [Monotone-devel] minor documentation bug in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/20