[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1
From: |
Markus Wanner |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:17:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101030 Icedove/3.0.10 |
On 01/04/2011 05:48 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Richard Levitte <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Why should libbotan1.7-dev need to depend on libssl-dev?
>
> It's botan-config that adds -lcrypto to the link line, so it's
> libbotan1.7-dev's responsibility to ensure that the bare
> "libcrypto.so" symlink exists, which would be accomplished by
> depending on libssl-dev.
I think you are mixing -dev and non-dev packages. libbotan1.7-dev
doesn't depend on any other -dev package. While libbotan1.7 very well
depends on libssl0.9.8 (but still not libssl-dev) (on lenny, that is).
On squeeze, I'm able to compile monotone (c2d9a013..) just fine without
having libssl-dev installed (but with libssl0.9.8).
Regards
Markus Wanner
- [Monotone-devel] minor documentation bug in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1,
Markus Wanner <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/20