It would be good to cross-check these OAI entries for a workflow with
those we have refined for the e-Bank data entries - for example the
issues of granularity of the description, citations of the entries,
etc. The source address is an interesting issue and relates to how
the "effective workflow repository" is to be constructed - is this an
institutional repository or a P2P sharing from researchers desktops, or
a national repository?
Jeremy
On 10 Apr 2007, at 17:23, Antoon Goderis wrote:
Following a discussion with Alan, here's a list of things to include
(require) for any OAI workflow entry. These would be the minimum amount of
information needed about a workflow we can derive from any workflow
definition; if the info is not included, users should be prompted for it.
- name
- author
- creation date
- textual description
- workflow language
- inputs/outputs (signature)
- constituting services working on upload, yes/no (necessary but not
sufficient condition for working workflow)
Here are some entries we weren't sure whether they should be made
mandatory
for OAI entries
- descriptions of constituting services
- source of upload (IP address)
- repeatability of worklfow (yielding same results)
- tags
- ontology concepts
_______________________________________________
Myexperiment-discuss mailing list
address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/myexperiment-discuss
Jeremy Frey
School of Chemistry
University of Southampton
Southampton
SO17 1BJ
UK
Tel: +44(0) 23 8059 3209
address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>