--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
RE: the provenance UML figure |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:20:36 -0400 |
Hi Carole,
Congratulations!
Also, wanted to mention, on your first question about the "scientific
object model", maybe it was the biomedical informatics objects, caBIO?
That model, and associated data services, already exists.
The object model is in the same html link that Common was in, its in the
package "cabio":
http://ncicb.nci.nih.gov/NCICB/content/ncicblfs/EA/caCORE3-2Model/index.
htm
Denise
303-722-9446
-----Original Message-----
From: Carole Goble [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:08 AM
To: Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) [E]
Cc: Covitz, Peter (NIH/NCI) [E]; Komatsoulis, George (NIH/NCI) [E]
Subject: Re: the provenance UML figure
Denise
Thanks! It was a great success!! And it all worked! Wo-ho!
We showed a complete generic metadata virtualisation and provisioning
capability in GT4 with lifetime management of metadata in the
middleware.
Carole
> Good luck! Keep in touch!
>
> Denise
> 303-722-9446
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carole Goble [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 8:57 AM
> To: Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) [E]
> Cc: Covitz, Peter (NIH/NCI) [E]; Komatsoulis, George (NIH/NCI) [E]
> Subject: Re: the provenance UML figure
>
>
> Denise
>
> Many thanks for the paper and the pointers. I have passed this to our
> Provenance lead (Khalid).
> At the moment I am in final review for an EU project (and you know how
> intense those reviews are...)
>
> Carole
>
>
>> Hi Carole,
>>
>> Likewise! Given slightly different approaches to common
infrastructure
>>
>
>
>> problems - I think there is much to be shared and learned to benefit
>>
> both!
>
>> I am particularly interested in our sharing details about metadata
>> structure for semantic annotations both on data semantics, as well as
>> service semantics, to see how we can harmonize on an interoperable
>> structure that works across communities.
>>
>> On the Provenance Model we are using, a description of it is part of
>> our caCORE 3 paper - 'in press' in the Journal of Biomedical
>> Informatics. Our use of wiki's in core infrastructure is
...limited...
>>
>> Komatsoulis, GA; Warzel, DB; Hartel, FW; Shanbhag, K; Chilukuri, R;
>> Fragoso, G; DeCoronado, S; Ludet, C and PA Covitz (2007) caCORE
>> version 3: Implementation of an model driven, service oriented
>> architecture for semantic interoperability. Journal of Biomedical
>> Informatics in press
>>
>> In the meantime, here is an html link to the caCORE 3.2 UML model
that
>>
>
>
>> includes caDSR, caBIO and COMMON - Provenance model is part of the
>> Common package:
>>
>>
>
http://ncicb.nci.nih.gov/NCICB/content/ncicblfs/EA/caCORE3-2Model/index.
> htm
>
>> You can also view our common provenance model in the UML Model
Browser
>>
>
>
>> as a set of classes and attributes:
>> http://umlmodelbrowser.nci.nih.gov/umlmodelbrowser/
>>
>> To find it, drill down in caCORE Context in the tree, or use the
>> search panel to find the UML Project = "caCORE 3.1", sub Project =
>> "Common", Package = "gov.nih.nci.common.provenance.domain".
>>
>> If you click on the 'project name' column, you will be presented with
>> Project contact and documentation links, including the document in
the
>>
>
>
>> format above and links to the EVS model is there too.
>>
>> Denise
>>
>> 303-722-9446
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Carole Goble [mailto:address@hidden
>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 11:00 AM
>> To: Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) [E]
>> Cc: Covitz, Peter (NIH/NCI) [E]
>> Subject: the provenance UML figure
>>
>> Hi Denise
>>
>> It was great to talk to you yesterday. We have a lot of problems in
>> common.
>>
>> I have been roving over your wiki and I am trying to find the best
>>
> paper
>
>> that describes (a) the provenance model and (b) the revised
>>
> "scientific
>
>> object" model you are planning.
>>
>> Can you point me to the right place??
>>
>> Carole
>>
>>
--- End Message ---