[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2 |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:47:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.1 |
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 11:37 am, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> >so as HTB correctly points out, if i give *int to parse_num who
> >dereferences it as a *ssize_t, it will clobber 4 bytes of memory :/
>
> I was eventually meaning to convert filestruct line numbers to ssize_t's
> anyway, so I just moved that and related type changes up the timetable a
> bit. Does current CVS work for you?
nope ... the current one suffers from the same issue ... only difference is
the memory that is being clobbered has moved ;)
void do_gotolinecolumn(int line, ssize_t column, bool use_answer
...
if (!parse_line_column(answer, &line, &column) || line < 1 ||
...
so you're prob clobbering the column memory on the stack
> I do that because strncmp(s1, s2, (size_t)-1) should be equivalent to
> strcmp(s1, s2). Both of them stop running once they encounter a
> differing character and/or a null terminator in either the first or both
> strings (cf. glibc CVS, uClibc CVS, nstrcasecmp() and nstrncasecmp() in
> chars.c), so there shouldn't be any problem, since both strings are
> properly null-terminated.
fair enough ... HTB checks the arguments when the func is first called rather
than seeing if the func misbehaves in the process ...
-mike
- [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/26
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, Mike Frysinger, 2005/06/27
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, Mike Frysinger, 2005/06/27
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/27
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, Mike Frysinger, 2005/06/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, Mike Frysinger, 2005/06/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/28
Re: [Nano-devel] ready for testing: nano-1.3.8pre2, Mike Frysinger, 2005/06/28