[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo
From: |
Chris Allegretta |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:24:53 -0400 |
I do feel like we should remove all the files actually, no point in
having a dead repo sitting around. I think checking out trunk from
SVN should just produce a README which says to go use git. If people
have local changes, presumably trying to SVN up would produce a
conflict and not delete their changes.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 04 Apr 2016 20:51, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 04:15, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > they've removed the old git repo and i've pushed up my copy now.
>> > feel free to make any announcements.
>>
>> Should we also make a final commit to SVN, to say that development
>> has moved to git and the SVN repo is dead / abandoned / left as a
>> monument?
>
> makes sense to me. could add a flag file like '!!MOVED-TO-GIT' or
> update the configure file to use AC_MSG_ERROR([moved to git]). i
> don't think we'd want to delete all the files.
> -mike
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/04/01
- [Nano-devel] different authors between svn and git, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/04/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] different authors between svn and git, Mike Frysinger, 2016/04/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] different authors between svn and git, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/04/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] different authors between svn and git, Jordi Mallach, 2016/04/08